♠ Posted by Marc J. Soss in estate plan,florida estate planning,Last Will and Testament,post-marital agreement,pre-marital agreement,Revocable Trust,Sarasota attorney,Sarasota Tax Lawyer at Wednesday, September 16, 2015
The husband argued that the agreement did provide that
the property “owned or hereby acquired by each of them respectively” would be
free of claims of the other spouse. It also provided that “each party agrees
that neither will ever claim any interest in the other’s property,” and if one
party “purchases, [a]cquires, or otherwise obtains, property in [his/her] own
name, then [that party] shall be the sole owner of same.” Thankfully, both the
District Court of Appeals and the Supreme Court concurred and found that the
above general waiver language was broad enough to protect enhancement in value
of property and the husband’s separate earnings as separate property of the
husband, thus denying the wife an interest in those assets upon divorce.
When drafting marital agreements it is important to look
to Fla.Stats. Section 61.079 and Casto v.
Casto, 508 So.2d 330 (Fla. 1987), in which the Florida Supreme Court
found that unfairness or unreasonableness can negate enforceability, although
full and complete financial disclosures will still allow for enforceability
even if the agreement is unfair or unreasonable.